Here, we investigated whether Cuban treefrogs tadpoles Exposure to killed zoospores did not induce a protective response. However, tadpoles exposed to Bd metabolites had significantly lower Bd intensity and prevalence than tadpoles that were not exposed to metabolites. The metabolites Bd produce pose no risk of Bd infection and therefore make an epidemiologically safe prophylaxis treatment, protecting tadpoles against Bd. This work provides a promising potential for protecting amphibians in the wild as a disease management strategy for controlling Bd‐associated declines.
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
more » « less
Abstract Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) has been associated with massive amphibian population declines worldwide. Wildlife vaccination campaigns have proven effective for mitigating damage from other pathogens, and there is evidence that adult frogs can acquire resistance to Bd when exposed to killed Bd zoospores and the metabolites they produced.Osteopilus septentrionalis can gain protection from Bd through exposure to a prophylaxis treatment composed of killed zoospores or soluble Bd metabolites. We used a 2 × 2 factorial design, crossing the presence or absence of killed zoospores with the presence or absence of Bd metabolites. All hosts were subsequently exposed to live Bd to evaluate susceptibility. -
more » « less
Abstract Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) is a pathogenic fungus that has devastated amphibian populations globally by causing the disease chytridiomycosis.Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis is capable of infecting non‐amphibian hosts, such as crayfish, and has been detected on reptile and bird species. Given the taxonomic heterogeneity in the known hosts and vectors of Bd, it is likely that there is a diversity of undiscovered non‐amphibian hosts of the fungus.Here, we investigated whether Bd could survive on freshwater snails (
Physella acuta ) andCladophora algae. We exposed small and large snails (n = 15 snails/size category),Cladophora algae (n = 5), and artificial spring water controls (ASW;n = 5) to live Bd. We also maintained Bd‐free control snails (n = 5 snails/size category) in ASW. All treatments were maintained for 7 weeks at 18°C. Mortality was checked three times a week, snails were weighed every 2 weeks, and 7 weeks after exposure, the snails, algae, and water were tested for Bd using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.We found that Bd did not grow on live snails, algae, or ASW long term. Additionally, live snails (
n = 20) collected from Bd‐positive ponds in California were all negative for Bd, as well. Given that we found no Bd on the experimentally exposed or field swabbed snails, snails are probably not a reservoir host of Bd.While negative results are often not published, Bd is one of the deadliest pathogens on earth; it is essential to know what is and is not capable of maintaining Bd for well‐designed disease models.
